Topic: under accepted canons of statutory interpretation, we must … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #3701

6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 133 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Boise Cascade Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Boise Cascade Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency Anchor
ca9 · 1991
green “under accepted canons of statutory interpretation, we must interpret statutes as a whole, giving effect to each word and making every effort not to interpret a provision in a manner that renders other provisions of the same statute inconsistent, meaningless or superfluous.” 58
2 Curtis v. Loether
scotus · 1974
green “a damages action under the fha sounds basically in tort-the statute merely defines a new legal duty, and authorizes the courts to compensate a plaintiff for the injury caused by the defendant's wrongful breach.” 38
3 Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
scotus · 1972
yellow “the language of the act is broad and inclusive.” 20
4 Jimmy Leong v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General
ca9 · 2003
green “focuses on a plaintiff's excusable ignorance and lack of prejudice to the defendant.” 10
5 Fair Housing Council, Inc. v. Village of Olde St. Andrews, Inc.
ca6 · 2006
green “begins to run from the date that the individual attempted to buy the unit and discovered the nonconforming conditions” 4
6 Fair Housing Council, Inc. v. Village of Olde St. Andrews, Inc.
ca6 · 2006
green “is tolled until the noncompliant conditions are remedied” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check