2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Paris Foods Corp. v. Foresite Foods, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paris Foods Corp. v. Foresite Foods, Inc. Anchor | green | “strict compliance with paca is required to preserve one's rights in a paca statutory trust” | 3 |
| 2 | American Banana Co., Inc. v. Republic National Bank Of New York | green | “strict eligibility requirements accompany the extraordinary protection afforded by paca's trust provision” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.