Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 138 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Couch v. Telescope Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Couch v. Telescope Inc. Anchor | green | “the circuits are in dispute on the question and the court of appeals of the circuit has not spoken on the point, if complicated questions arise under foreign law, or if novel and difficult questions of first impression are presented.” | 76 |
| 2 | Couch v. Telescope Inc. | green | “to determine if a 'substantial ground for difference of opinion' exists under 1292(b), courts must examine to what extent the controlling law is unclear.” | 27 |
| 3 | Couch v. Telescope Inc. | green | “that settled law might be applied differently does not establish a substantial ground for difference of opinion.” | 24 |
| 4 | Villarreal v. Caremark LLC | green | “the decision to certify an order for interlocutory appeal is committed to the sound discretion of the district court.” | 7 |
| 5 | Boyd v. Coventry Health Care Inc. | green | “bears the burden of proving that the prospective appeal satisfies each of the statutory prerequisites for certification.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.