Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 167 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Charles Johnson, Jr. v. City of Atlanta.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charles Johnson, Jr. v. City of Atlanta Anchor | green | “undisputed, meaning that its authenticity is not challenged.” | 67 |
| 2 | United States v. William Rey | green | “a court may take judicial notice of its own records and the records of inferior courts.” | 57 |
| 3 | Rolando Gus Paez v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections | green | “can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” | 25 |
| 4 | Rolando Gus Paez v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections | green | “rule 201 does not require courts to warn parties before taking judicial notice of some fact, but, upon the party's request, it does require an opportunity to be heard after the court takes notice.” | 15 |
| 5 | Collier v. Buckner | green | “a court may take judicial notice of the contents of public records, such as state court proceedings, without converting a motion to dismiss into a summary judgment motion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.