Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 127 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Henning.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Henning Anchor | green | “a reasonable ground for suspicion, supported by circumstances indicative of an illegal act.” | 45 |
| 2 | State v. Meeks | green | “whether, in light of all the evidence available, the magistrate had a substantial basis for finding probable cause.” | 28 |
| 3 | State v. Henning | green | “containing allegations from which the magistrate can determine whether probable cause exists,” | 20 |
| 4 | State v. Smith | green | “the nexus between the place to be searched and the items to be seized may be established by the type of crime, the nature of the items, and the normal inferences where a criminal would hide the evidence.” | 15 |
| 5 | State v. Carter | green | “in reviewing the existence of probable cause for issuance of a warrant, we may consider only the affidavit and may not consider any other evidence known by the affiant or provided to or possessed by the issuing magistrate.” | 10 |
| 6 | State v. Williams | green | “probable cause generally requires reasonable grounds for suspicion, supported by circumstances indicative of an illegal act.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.