Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 128 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smith v. Kelly.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith v. Kelly Anchor | green | “a functionally equivalent two-element standard governs petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under the sixth amendment.” | 47 |
| 2 | Green v. Franke | green | “more than mere possibility, but less than probability” | 37 |
| 3 | Green v. Franke | green | “could have tended to affect the outcome of the case.” | 18 |
| 4 | Johnson v. Premo | green | “petitioner suffered prejudice as a result of counsel's inadequacy.” | 10 |
| 5 | Hale v. Belleque | green | “preservation principles apply in the context of post-conviction relief and, as a general rule, arguments not made to the post-conviction court in support of a claim will not be considered on appeal.” | 10 |
| 6 | Pike v. Cain | green | “whether the omitted information is the type that could have affected the outcome if presented to an objective, reasonable factfinder.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.