Topic: precise questioning is imperative as a predicate for the of… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #3918

6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 125 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bronston v. United States.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Bronston v. United States Anchor
scotus · 1973
green “precise questioning is imperative as a predicate for the offense of perjury.” 43
2 Bronston v. United States
scotus · 1973
green “the burden is on the questioner to pin the witness down to the specific object of the questioner's inquiry.” 28
3 Bronston v. United States
scotus · 1973
green “literally true but not responsive to the question asked and arguably misleading by negative implication.” 21
4 United States v. Fred J. Lighte
ca2 · 1986
green “a question is fundamentally ambiguous when it 'is not a phrase with a meaning about which men of ordinary intellect could agree, nor one which could be used with mutual understanding by a questioner and answerer unless it were defined at the time it were sought and offered as te…” 21
5 United States v. George W. Brumley, Sr., Robert W. Harrison, and William T. Thomas
ca5 · 1977
green “especially in perjury cases, defendants may not be assumed into the penitentiary.” 7
6 United States v. Demond Jamal Camper
ca9 · 2004
green “bronston's rule is limited to cases in which the statement is indisputably true, though misleading because it was unresponsive to the question asked.” 5

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check