Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 124 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Bullion, James D..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Bullion, James D. Anchor | green | “the striking of a balance of uncertainties can rarely be deemed unreasonable....” | 45 |
| 2 | Chi. Reg'l Council of Carpenters Pension Fund v. Celtic Floor Covering, Inc. | green | “an ultimatum on one side, met with steadfast defiance on the other, is not a good faith discussion.” | 36 |
| 3 | Chicago Observer, Inc. v. City of Chicago | green | “litigation is costly not only for the litigants but also for parties in other cases waiting in the queue for judicial attention.” | 20 |
| 4 | Frank M. Rosetto, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons v. Pabst Brewing Company, Inc. | green | “protracted discovery, is the bane of modern litigation.” | 20 |
| 5 | Illinois ex rel. Hartigan v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. | green | “language a trap rather than a mode of communication.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.