2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Peter v. NantKwest, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. Anchor | green | “that 'expenses' and 'attorney's fees' ap- pear in tandem across various statutes shifting litigation costs indicates that congress understands the two terms to be distinct and not inclusive of each other.” | 3 |
| 2 | Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. | green | “e are particularly reluctant to disrupt precedents interpret- ing language that congress has since reenacted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.