Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 124 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cavazos, Abraham.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cavazos, Abraham Anchor | green | “meeting this threshold requires more than mere speculation-it requires affirmative evidence that both raises the lesser-included offense and rebuts or negates an element of the greater offense.” | 58 |
| 2 | Godsey v. State | green | “cannot be plucked out of the record and examined in a vacuum.” | 43 |
| 3 | Cavazos, Abraham | green | “pulling out a gun, pointing it at someone, pulling the trigger twice, fleeing the scene (and the country), and later telling a friend 'i didn't mean to shoot anyone' does not rationally support an inference that appellant acted recklessly at the moment he fired the shots.” | 23 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.