Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 118 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Angela M. Phelps v. John D. McClellan.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Angela M. Phelps v. John D. McClellan Anchor | green | “in determining what constitutes prejudice, the court considers whether the assertion of the new claim or defense would: require the opponent to expend significant additional resources to conduct discovery and prepare for trial; significantly delay the resolution of the dispute; …” | 87 |
| 2 | United States v. Midwest Suspension and Brake | green | “although rule 15(a) indicates that leave to amend shall be freely granted, a party must act with due diligence if it intends to take advantage of the rule's liberality.” | 31 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.