Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 115 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann Anchor | green | “(1) formation of a contract, (2) performance by plaintiff of any conditions precedent to his right to demand performance by the defendant, and (3) breach of the contract by defendant.” | 46 |
| 2 | Everyday Learning Corporation, - Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Cheryl Larson, - Appellant/cross-Appellee | green | “must still prove its actual damages to a reasonable degree of certainty.” | 23 |
| 3 | Jenkins ex rel. Agyei v. Missouri | green | “the phrase 'any money judgment' in section 1961(a) is construed as including a judgment awarding attorneys' fees.” | 16 |
| 4 | Everyday Learning Corporation, - Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Cheryl Larson, - Appellant/cross-Appellee | green | “when a default judgment is entered on a claim for an indefinite or uncertain amount of damages, facts alleged in the complaint are taken as true, except facts relating to the amount of damages, which must be proved in a supplemental hearing or proceeding.” | 10 |
| 5 | Park Nicollet Clinic v. Hamann | green | “we have recognized that the plaintiff may not have to allege that the breach caused damages in order to state a claim for breach of contract.” | 10 |
| 6 | Katch, LLC v. Sweetser | green | “a federal court sitting in diversity employs the choice of law principles of the forum state when deciding whether a contractual choice of law provision applies.” | 4 |
| 7 | Tempo Music, Inc. v. Christenson Food & Mercantile Co. | green | “blatant disregard for the law warrants an award of costs and attorneys' fees.” | 3 |
| 8 | Tana Cutcliff v. Kathleen Reuter | green | “readily discernable on the basis of undisputed evidence in the record.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.