Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 842 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Schultz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Schultz Anchor | green | “pinpoint the specific findings that the party disagrees with.” | 412 |
| 2 | Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc. | green | “in order to challenge the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge, a party must file written objections which shall specifically identify the portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection is made and the specific basis for objection.” | 249 |
| 3 | Colleen Macort v. Prem, Inc. | green | “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report to which objection is made and may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” | 102 |
| 4 | Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “even if we find that the evidence preponderates against the commissioner's decision, we must affirm if the decision is supported by substantial evidence.” | 39 |
| 5 | Dale J. MacGREGOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary, Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | red | “must scrutinize the record as a whole to determine if the decision reached is reasonable and supported by substantial evidence.” | 25 |
| 6 | Deborah Ann Packer v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | green | “we may not reweigh the evidence or substitute our judgment for that of the alj.” | 6 |
| 7 | Victor Baez v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “may not reweigh the evidence or decide facts anew, and must defer to the alj's decision if it is supported by substantial evidence . . . .” | 5 |
| 8 | Ollie G. CHESTER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “plaintiff exhausted his administrative remedies whereupon the alj's determination became the secretary's final decision.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.