2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fair Wind Sailing Inc v. H. Dempster.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fair Wind Sailing Inc v. H. Dempster Anchor | green | “we therefore import octane fitness's definition of 'exceptionality' into our interpretation of 35(a) of the lanham act.” | 3 |
| 2 | Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health | green | “n 'exceptional' case is simply one that stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party's litigating position (considering both the governing law and the facts of the case) or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.