Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 106 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co. Anchor | red | “the most appropriate or analogous state statute of limitations.” | 66 |
| 2 | Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co. | red | “fundamental injury to the individual rights of a person” | 29 |
| 3 | Windham v. American Brands, Inc. | green | “it is well-settled in this jurisdiction that the proponent of class certification has the burden of establishing the right to such certification under rule 23.” | 7 |
| 4 | In Re: Monumental | green | “no difficulty concluding that whether plaintiffs were provided constructive notice is an issue that can be decided on a classwide basis.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.