Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 113 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Blackwell v. Federal Bureau of Investigation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blackwell v. Federal Bureau of Investigation Anchor | green | “to show that the disputed documents were compiled for law enforcement purposes, the agency need only establish a rational nexus between the investigation and one of the agency's law enforcement duties and a connection between an individual or incident and a possible security ris…” | 89 |
| 2 | American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of Justice | green | “in deciding whether the release of particular information constitutes an unwarranted invasion of privacy under exemption 7(c), we must balance the public interest in disclosure against the privacy interest congress intended the exemption to protect.” | 24 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.