Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 111 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp. Anchor | green | “it will not do for a court to be compelled to guess at the theory underlying the agency's action; nor can a court be expected to chisel that which must be precise from what the agency has left vague and indecisive.” | 46 |
| 2 | Kelly Dillery, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. City of Sandusky, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees. Kelly Dillery v. City of Sandusky | red | “it is well-established that 'issues adverted to in a perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation, are deemed waived.” | 39 |
| 3 | Ferdinand Liti v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General | red | “like affirmative inconsistencies, omissions may form the basis of an adverse credibility determination, provided that they are substantially related to the asylum claim.” | 20 |
| 4 | Ernesto Adolfo Recinos De Leon v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General | green | “is extreme in its lack of a coherent explanation” | 3 |
| 5 | Fatos Vasha v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General | green | “any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.