Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 74 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Picard v. Connor.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Picard v. Connor Anchor | green | “opportunity to pass upon and correct alleged violations of the prisoners' federal rights” | 57 |
| 2 | Russell L. O'Bremski v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary | green | “if it 24 plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in 25 the district court. . .” | 11 |
| 3 | Michael T. Herbst v. Dave Cook, Director Oregon Department of Corrections | green | “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not 5 entitled to relief in the district court . . . .” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.