Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 111 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Withrow v. Larkin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Withrow v. Larkin Anchor | green | “without a showing to the contrary, state administrators 'are assumed to be men of conscience and intellectual discipline, capable of judging a particular controversy fairly on the basis of its own circumstances.” | 62 |
| 2 | Schweiker v. McClure | green | “this presumption can be rebutted by a showing of conflict of interest or some other specific reason for disqualification.” | 41 |
| 3 | Schweiker v. McClure | green | “but the burden of establishing a disqualifying interest rests on the party making the assertion.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.