Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 107 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gurung v. White Way Threading LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gurung v. White Way Threading LLC Anchor | green | “in an flsa case, the court must independently ascertain the reasonableness of the fee request.” | 56 |
| 2 | A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. Walling | green | “extending the frontiers of social progress by insuring to all our able-bodied working men and women a fair day's pay for a fair day's work.” | 37 |
| 3 | Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. | green | “the unique policy considerations underlying” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.