Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 103 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wesberry v. Sanders.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wesberry v. Sanders Anchor | green | “as nearly as is practicable one man's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's.” | 60 |
| 2 | Kirkpatrick v. Preisler | green | “permits only the limited population variances which are unavoidable despite a good-faith effort to achieve absolute equality, or for which justification is shown.” | 22 |
| 3 | Karcher v. Daggett | green | “the population differences among districts could have been reduced or eliminated altogether by a good-faith effort to draw districts of equal population.” | 12 |
| 4 | Karcher v. Daggett | green | “each significant variance between districts was necessary to achieve some legitimate goal.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.