Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 103 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Condo v. BD. OF REVIEW, DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Condo v. BD. OF REVIEW, DEPT. OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY Anchor | green | “while the statute does not define 'good cause,' our courts have construed the statute to mean 'cause sufficient to justify an employee's voluntarily leaving the ranks of the employed and joining the ranks of the unemployed.” | 25 |
| 2 | Brady v. Board of Review | green | “unless . . . the agency's action was arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable, the agency's ruling should not be disturbed.” | 22 |
| 3 | Medwick v. Bd. of Review, Div. Empl. SEC. | green | “mere dissatisfaction with working conditions which are not shown to be abnormal or do not affect health, does not constitute good cause for leaving work voluntarily.” | 20 |
| 4 | Domenico v. LABOR & INDUSTRY DEPT. REVIEW BD. | green | “it is the employee's responsibility to do what is necessary and reasonable in order to remain employed.” | 12 |
| 5 | Fernandez v. Board of Review | green | “the decision to leave employment must be compelled by real, substantial and reasonable circumstances . . . attributable to the work.” | 7 |
| 6 | Futterman v. Board of Review | green | “the underlying purpose of the unemployment compensation law 'is to provide some income for the worker earning nothing because he is out of work through no fault or act of his own.” | 6 |
| 7 | Robert Lavezzi v. State of N.J. (072856) | green | “thus, to the extent the agency's determination constitutes a legal conclusion, we review it de novo.” | 6 |
| 8 | Cottman v. Bd. of Review | green | “an employee knows that he or she is about to be fired, the employee may quit without becoming ineligible.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.