Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 102 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Johnnie Wade v. Knoxville Utilities Board.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnnie Wade v. Knoxville Utilities Board Anchor | green | “when amendment is sought at a late stage in the litigation, there is an increased burden to show justification for failing to move earlier.” | 56 |
| 2 | Paul Moore v. City of Paducah Mayor John Penrod Joe Viterisi, Harold Ford, Robert Coleman, and Joe Flynn, Commissioners Robert E. Green | green | “at least some significant showing of prejudice to the opponent.” | 23 |
| 3 | Temujin Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. | green | “the key is whether the complaint is so verbose, confused and redundant that its true substance, if any, is well disguised.” | 17 |
| 4 | Flayter v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections | green | “a prolix and confusing complaint should be dismissed because it makes it difficult for the defendant to file a responsive pleading and for the court to conduct orderly litigation.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.