Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 100 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Davis v. New York.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davis v. New York Anchor | green | “conclusory statements or mere allegations are not sufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion.” | 90 |
| 2 | Durakovic v. BUILDING SERVICE 32 BJ PENSION FUND | green | “there is no genuine issue of material fact where the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.