Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 100 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Matthew L..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arizona Department of Economic Security v. Matthew L. Anchor | green | “we view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the juvenile court's order.” | 35 |
| 2 | Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security | green | “provide a parent with the time and opportunity to participate in programs designed to improve the parent's ability to care for the child.” | 27 |
| 3 | Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security | green | “a reasonable prospect of success.” | 21 |
| 4 | Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security | green | “undertake measures with a reasonable prospect of success.” | 17 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.