Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 99 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Williams v. Martinez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams v. Martinez Anchor | green | “divests federal courts of jurisdiction to hear habeas petitions by prisoners who could have raised viable claims pursuant to 23-110(a).” | 65 |
| 2 | Gary E. Byrd v. John S. Henderson and United States of America | green | “in order to collaterally attack his sentence in an article iii court a district of columbia prisoner faces a hurdle that a federal prisoner does not.” | 30 |
| 3 | Ibrahim v. United States | green | “not a procedural bar to otherwise available federal habeas claims; it is congress's deliberate channeling of constitutional collateral attacks on superior court sentences to courts within the district's judicial system (subject to supreme court review), with federal habeas avail…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.