Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 95 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Patterson v. County of Oneida.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Patterson v. County of Oneida Anchor | green | “outlaws discrimination with respect to the enjoyment of benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of a contractual relationship, such as employment.” | 58 |
| 2 | Martha Ellen Brennan v. Metropolitan Opera Association, Inc., David Kneuss, Joseph Volpe | green | “a work environment will be considered hostile if a reasonable person would have found it to be so and if the plaintiff subjectively so perceived it.” | 19 |
| 3 | Malena v. Victoria's Secret Direct, LLC | green | “an individual may not be held liable merely for aiding and abetting his own discriminatory conduct but only for assisting another party in violating' that law.” | 10 |
| 4 | Williams v. Regus Management Group, LLC | green | “to make out the third prong of a prima facie case of discrimination under the nychrl, a plaintiff must simply show that she was treated differently from others in a way that was more than trivial, insubstantial, or petty.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.