Topic: we have repeatedly held that a state court's interpretation… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #53

8 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 279 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bradshaw v. Richey.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Bradshaw v. Richey Anchor
scotus · 2005
green “we have repeatedly held that a state court's interpretation of state law, including one announced on direct appeal of the challenged conviction, binds a federal court sitting in habeas corpus.” 114
2 Lambrix v. Singletary
scotus · 1997
green “judicial economy might counsel giving the question priority, for example, if it were easily resolvable against the habeas petitioner, whereas the procedural-bar issue involved complicated issues of state law.” 62
3 Mahdi v. Bagley
ca6 · 2008
green “no prejudice flows from the failure to raise a meritless claim.” 54
4 Maryland v. Blake
scotus · 2005
green “we have repeatedly held that a state court's interpretation of state law, including one announced on direct appeal of the challenged conviction, binds a federal court sitting in habeas corpus.” 17
5 Bradshaw v. Richey
scotus · 2005
green “state court's interpretation of state law, including one announced on direct appeal of the challenged conviction, binds a federal court sitting in habeas corpus.” 15
6 Bradshaw v. Richey
scotus · 2005
green “a state court's interpretation of state law, including one announced on direct appeal of the challenged conviction, binds a federal court sitting in habeas corpus” 7
7 Maryland v. Blake
scotus · 2005
green “state court's interpretation of state law, including one announced on direct appeal of the challenged conviction, binds a federal court sitting in habeas corpus.” 6
8 Maryland v. Blake
scotus · 2005
green “a state court's interpretation of state law, including one announced on direct appeal of the challenged conviction, binds a federal court sitting in habeas corpus” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check