Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 93 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Oluwaseun Sanya.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Oluwaseun Sanya Anchor | green | “must demonstrate not only that the district court plainly erred, but also that this error affected his substantial rights.” | 43 |
| 2 | United States v. Thornsbury | green | “generally, if a district court questions a defendant regarding the waiver of appellate rights during the rule 11 colloquy and the record indicates that the defendant understood the full significance of the waiver, the waiver is valid.” | 31 |
| 3 | United States v. Manigan | green | “whether a defendant knowingly and intelligently agreed to waive his right of appeal must be evaluated by reference to the totality of the circumstances.” | 8 |
| 4 | United States v. William Davis | green | “will enforce the waiver if it is valid and the issue appealed is within the scope of the waiver.” | 5 |
| 5 | United States v. Glenda Taylor-Sanders | green | “as falling under this exception,” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Glenda Taylor-Sanders | green | “permits us to review claims that the district court's sentence . . . exceeded the court's statutory authority.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.