Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 681 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lorenzo Lopez, on Behalf of Roberta Lopez, Deceased v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lorenzo Lopez, on Behalf of Roberta Lopez, Deceased v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security Anchor | green | “the decision cannot stand if it lacks evidentiary support or an adequate discussion of the issues.” | 259 |
| 2 | Roberta Skinner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner | green | “more than a scintilla but may be less than a preponderance.” | 257 |
| 3 | Julian DIAZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee | green | “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 72 |
| 4 | Hattie Dixon v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | green | “(1) whether the claimant is currently employed, (2) whether the claimant has a severe impairment, (3) whether the claimant's impairment is one that the commissioner considers conclusively disabling, (4) if the claimant does not have a conclusively disabling impairment, whether h…” | 47 |
| 5 | Rebecca Pepper v. Carolyn W. Colvin | green | “an alj must adequately explain his credibility finding by discussing specific reasons supported by the record.” | 39 |
| 6 | Lorenzo Lopez, on Behalf of Roberta Lopez, Deceased v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security | green | “nevertheless, the court must conduct a 'critical review of the evidence' before affirming the commissioner's decision, and the decision cannot stand if it lacks evidentiary support or an adequate discussion of the issues.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.