Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 87 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Darby v. Cisneros.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darby v. Cisneros Anchor | green | “where the apa applies, an appeal to 'superior agency authority' is a prerequisite to judicial review only when expressly required by statute or when an agency rule requires appeal before review and the administrative action is made inoperative pending that review.” | 55 |
| 2 | Darby v. Cisneros | green | “has limited the availability of the doctrine of exhaustion of administrative remedies to that which the statute or rule clearly mandates.” | 14 |
| 3 | Sun Towers, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “only if it is arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, not in accordance with law, or unsupported by substantial evidence on the record taken as a whole.” | 11 |
| 4 | Cedyco Corp. v. PetroQuest Energy, LLC | green | “the inclusion of words such as 'if,' 'provided,' 'on condition that,' or some similar phrase of conditional language indicate that the parties intended there to be a condition precedent” | 4 |
| 5 | In the Matter of Timely Secretarial Service, Inc., Debtor. General Electric Credit Corporation v. Timely Secretarial Service, Inc. | green | “conditions precedent to most contractual obligations are not favored and must be expressed in plain, unambiguous language” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.