Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 86 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shrestha v. Holder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shrestha v. Holder Anchor | green | “an adverse credibility determination is not necessarily a death knell to cat protection.” | 38 |
| 2 | Rizk v. Holder | red | “conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” | 26 |
| 3 | Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service | green | “country conditions alone can play a decisive role in granting relief under the convention.” | 22 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.