Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 85 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Audler v. Astrue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Audler v. Astrue Anchor | green | “procedural perfection in administrative proceedings is not required' as long as 'the substantial rights of a party have not been affected.” | 38 |
| 2 | Frances Hames v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “substantial evidence is more than a scintilla, less than a preponderance, and is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” | 34 |
| 3 | Frances Hames v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “must do more than create a suspicion of the existence of the fact to be established.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.