Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 82 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Watkins.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Watkins Anchor | green | “the allegations in the complaint are not controlling . . . and only uncontroverted factual allegations are accepted as true. . . .” | 42 |
| 2 | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Watkins | green | “the movant is deemed to be challenging the factual basis for the court's subject matter jurisdiction.” | 27 |
| 3 | State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition v. Rowland | green | “may resolve disputed factual issues by reference to evidence outside the pleadings, including affidavits” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.