Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 82 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Gladue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Gladue Anchor | green | “consistently distinguish between the terms 'waiver' and 'forfeiture.” | 22 |
| 2 | United States v. Bare | green | “may affirm only such findings of guilty and the sentence or such part or amount of the sentence, as we find correct in law and fact and determine, on the basis of the entire record, should be approved.” | 22 |
| 3 | United States v. Green | green | “instead, an appellate court may determine if the accused has been prejudiced by testing whether the alleged error has any merit and would have led to a favorable recommendation by the sja or corrective action by the convening authority.” | 21 |
| 4 | United States v. Green | green | “does not result in an automatic return by the appellate court of the case to the convening authority.” | 17 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.