Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 81 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Monitor Patriot Co. v. Roy Anchor | green | “has its fullest and most urgent application precisely to the conduct of campaigns for political office.” | 64 |
| 2 | Lowe v. Hearst Communications, Inc. | green | “there is legitimate public interest in facts tending to support an allegation of criminal activity, even if the prosecutor does not intend to pursue a conviction” | 7 |
| 3 | Larson v. Family Violence & Sexual Assault Prevention Center of South Texas | green | “for presenting a true account of events, regardless of what someone may infer from the account.” | 4 |
| 4 | Yiamouyiannis v. Thompson | green | “not capable of proof one way or the other” | 3 |
| 5 | Newspapers, Inc. v. Matthews | green | “in order to entitle one to maintain an action for an alleged defamatory statement, it must appear he is the person with reference to whom the statement was made.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.