Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 canonical passages across 9 cases, quoted by 56 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. One-Sixth Share of Bulger in All Present & Future Proceeds of Mass Millions Lottery Ticket No. M246233.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. One-Sixth Share of Bulger in All Present & Future Proceeds of Mass Millions Lottery Ticket No. M246233 Anchor | green | “standing is a threshold consideration in all cases, including civil forfeiture cases.” | 9 |
| 2 | United States v. One Lincoln Navigator 1998, Freddie Bearden Wanda Breedlove Andrews, Claimants-Appellants | green | “defined by the law of the state” | 7 |
| 3 | United States v. Seventeen Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars ($17,900.00) in United States Currency | green | “to prevail, a claimant must meet both article iii and statutory standing requirements.” | 6 |
| 4 | United States v. One-Sixth Share of Bulger in All Present & Future Proceeds of Mass Millions Lottery Ticket No. M246233 | green | “the federal courts have consistently held that unsecured creditors do not have standing to challenge the civil forfeiture of their debtors' property.” | 5 |
| 5 | United States v. Funds From Prudential Securities | green | “the extent of the interest in the defendant property sufficient to meet this standing requirement is left to case law.” | 5 |
| 6 | United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer & Co. | green | “the type of interest claimed dictates the type of evidence required to establish standing.” | 4 |
| 7 | United States v. Charles Emor | green | “in general, any colorable claim on the property suffices, if the claim of injury is "redressable, at least in part, by a return of the property.” | 4 |
| 8 | United States v. Charles Emor | green | “while some courts have focused on whether a party had an ownership or possessory interest under state law at the time of forfeiture, other courts have noted that it is the injury to the party seeking standing that remains the ultimate focus.” | 4 |
| 9 | UNITED STATES of America v. $487,825.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY David Aguasviva, Appellant | green | “come forward as quickly as possible . . . so that the court may hear all interested parties and resolve the dispute without delay,” | 3 |
| 10 | United States v. 8 Gilcrease Lane, Quincy Florida 32351 | green | “turns upon whether the claimant has a sufficient interest in the property to create a case or controversy.” | 3 |
| 11 | United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, Baer & Co. | green | “asserted their interest in the property in the manner set forth in the supplemental rules.” | 3 |
| 12 | United States v. Seventeen Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars ($17,900.00) in United States Currency | green | “manner and degree of evidence required” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.