Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 79 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Trussell v. General Motors Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Trussell v. General Motors Corp. Anchor | green | “(1) malice in instituting or continuing the prosecution, (2) lack of probable cause, and (3) termination of the prosecution in favor of the accused.” | 52 |
| 2 | Ash v. Ash | green | “a proceeding is 'terminated in favor of the accused' only when its final disposition indicates that the accused is innocent.” | 12 |
| 3 | Feliciano v. City of Cleveland | green | “affirmative approval of a particular decision made by the subordinate.” | 12 |
| 4 | Sweat v. Butler | green | “the legal standards for a claim of inadequate supervision and one of inadequate training are essentially the same.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.