Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 53 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stalley Ex Rel. United States v. Catholic Health Initiatives.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stalley Ex Rel. United States v. Catholic Health Initiatives Anchor | green | “accept as true all factual allegations in the complaint, giving no effect to conclusory allegations of law,” | 28 |
| 2 | Melanie Davis v. Anthony, Inc. | green | “a factual attack occurs when the defendant challenges the veracity of the facts underpinning subject matter jurisdiction.” | 20 |
| 3 | Les Hadley v. North Arkansas Community Technical College | green | “the eleventh amendment immunizes an unconsenting state from damage actions brought in federal court, except when congress has abrogated that immunity for a particular federal cause of action.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.