Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 76 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL Anchor | green | “construe the pleadings and any supporting materials in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs.” | 35 |
| 2 | Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. Miller | green | “it may determine the motion on the basis of affidavits alone; or it may permit discovery in aid of the motion; or it may conduct an evidentiary hearing on the merits of the motion.” | 17 |
| 3 | Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. Miller | green | “considerable procedural leeway” | 14 |
| 4 | In Re Magnetic Audiotape Antitrust Litigation | green | “an averment of facts that, if credited, would suffice to establish jurisdiction over the defendant.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.