Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 74 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Viasystems, Inc. v. EBM-Papst St. Georgen GmbH & Co., KG.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Viasystems, Inc. v. EBM-Papst St. Georgen GmbH & Co., KG Anchor | green | “the touchstone of the due-process analysis remains whether the defendant has sufficient 'minimum contacts with the forum state such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend 'traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” | 19 |
| 2 | Gerald Pecoraro v. Sky Ranch For Boys | green | “the central question is whether a defendant has purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum state and should, therefore, reasonably anticipate being haled into court there.” | 14 |
| 3 | Pope v. Elabo GmbH | green | “as long as there is 'some evidence upon which a prima facie showing of jurisdiction may be found to exist,' the rule 12(b)(2) motion will be denied.” | 13 |
| 4 | William A. Epps and Leslie A. Epps, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Stewart Information Services Corp. | green | “the burden does not shift to the party challenging jurisdiction.” | 12 |
| 5 | Pope v. Elabo GmbH | green | “the court need only consider whether exercising personal jurisdiction over defendants is consistent with due process.” | 8 |
| 6 | Creative Calling Solutions, Inc. v. LF Beauty Ltd. | green | “when a defendant has certain contacts with the forum state and the cause of action arises out of those contacts.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.