Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 79 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sykes v. Health Network Solutions, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sykes v. Health Network Solutions, Inc. Anchor | green | “to establish a claim for breach of fiduciary duty, a plaintiff must show that: (1) the defendant owed the plaintiff a fiduciary duty; (2) the defendant breached that fiduciary duty; and (3) the breach of fiduciary duty was a proximate cause of injury to the plaintiff.” | 27 |
| 2 | Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. Thompson | green | “parties to a contract do not thereby become each other's fiduciaries; they generally owe no special duty to one another beyond the terms of the contract.” | 25 |
| 3 | Azure Dolphin, LLC v. Barton | green | “in the event that a party 'fails to allege any special circumstances that could establish a fiduciary relationship,' dismissal of a claim which hinges upon the existence of such a relationship would be appropriate.” | 8 |
| 4 | Kaplan v. O.K. Technologies, L.L.C. | green | “no fiduciary relationship arises absent the existence of dominion and control by one party over another.” | 8 |
| 5 | Sykes v. Health Network Solutions, Inc. | green | “our courts have been clear that general contractual relationships do not typically rise to the level of fiduciary relationships.” | 7 |
| 6 | Ironman Med. Props., LLC v. Tanvir Chodri | green | “a constructive fraud claim requires a plaintiff to allege and show (1) that the defendant owes the plaintiff a fiduciary duty; (2) that the defendant breached that duty; and (3) that the defendant sought to benefit himself in the transaction.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.