Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 72 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A. Anchor | green | “generally regarded with disfavor because of the limited importance of pleading in federal practice, and because they are often used as a delaying tactic.” | 57 |
| 2 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Timeless Investments, Inc. | green | “reservation of affirmative defenses' is not an affirmative defense.” | 8 |
| 3 | McArdle v. AT & T MOBILITY LLC | green | “under any set of facts the defendant might allege.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.