Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 72 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Mason.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Mason Anchor | green | “the mere present inability to personally care for one's children as a result of incarceration does not constitute grounds for termination.” | 38 |
| 2 | In Re Mason | green | “the state is not relieved of its duties to engage an absent parent merely because that parent is incarcerated.” | 31 |
| 3 | In re Pops | green | “when an incarcerated parent requests placement of his or her children with a relative, as long as the children are provided adequate care, state interference with such decisions is not warranted.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.