Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 70 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dana Blackie v. State of Maine.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dana Blackie v. State of Maine Anchor | green | “withhold from the employee an accouterment of the employment relationship, say, by failing to follow a customary practice of considering her for promotion after a particular period of service.” | 24 |
| 2 | Vincent DeNOVELLIS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, Appellee | green | “may not rest upon mere allegation or denials of the movant's pleading, but must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue” | 20 |
| 3 | Jorge VEGA and Eusebio Leon, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. KODAK CARIBBEAN, LTD., Defendant, Appellee | green | “working conditions so intolerable that a reasonable person would feel compelled to forsake his job rather than to submit to looming indignities.” | 14 |
| 4 | Lewis v. Gillette, Co. | green | “the alleged retaliators knew of the protected plaintiff's activity” | 3 |
| 5 | Cyneth K. Dahm v. William F. Flynn, Jr., in Both His Individual and Official Capacities | green | “terminating plaintiff's supervisory authority over other employees” | 3 |
| 6 | Digna Serrano-Cruz, Hector Irizarry, and the Conjugal Society Comprised Between Them v. Dfi Puerto Rico, Inc. | green | “by not accepting the newly created and ambiguous position, serrano foreclosed the possibility of presenting concrete evidence, rather than mere assertions, to a jury regarding the intolerable nature of her new working conditions.” | 3 |
| 7 | Simas v. First Citizens' Federal Credit Union | green | “proffered no facts to explain the extent of his prior authority and the significance of the 'removal.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.