2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Berger v. Berger.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Berger v. Berger Anchor | green | “a party abandons a claim when it fails to make a meaningful argument in support of its position.” | 34 |
| 2 | MacK v. City of Detroit | green | “ddressing a controlling legal issue despite the failure of the parties to properly frame the issue is a well understood judicial principle.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.