Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 82 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Green v. Mansour.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Green v. Mansour Anchor | green | “prospective injunctive relief to prevent a continuing violation of federal law.” | 50 |
| 2 | Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson | green | “does not normally permit federal courts to issue injunctions against state-court judges or clerks.” | 19 |
| 3 | Gregory T. Ambus v. Granite Board of Education | green | “if the eleventh amendment applies, it confers total immunity from suit, not merely a defense to liability.” | 8 |
| 4 | Gregory T. Ambus v. Granite Board of Education | green | “in the absence of a waiver, the eleventh amendment forbids a suit for damages against a state in federal court.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.