Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 70 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allstate Ins. Co. v. Kaklamanos Anchor | green | “a district court should exercise its discretion to grant certiorari review only when there has been a violation of a clearly established principle of law resulting in a miscarriage of justice.” | 46 |
| 2 | Fayad v. Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co. | green | “where general words follow an enumeration of specific words, the general words are construed as applying to the same kind or class as those that are specifically mentioned.” | 9 |
| 3 | Zelinka v. Americare Healthscan, Inc. | green | “in 1976, the statute was amended to include reference to 'broadcasts' in addition to 'publications' and to 'other mediums' in addition to newspapers and periodicals.” | 3 |
| 4 | Zelinka v. Americare Healthscan, Inc. | green | “in its original form, section 770.01 applied only to newspapers and periodicals.” | 3 |
| 5 | Zelinka v. Americare Healthscan, Inc. | green | “the denial of a motion to dismiss for failure to provide the presuit notice required by section 770.01 is a proper subject for certiorari review.” | 3 |
| 6 | Davies v. Bossert | green | “further, because the legislature enacted only minor amendments to the statute, consistent with technological developments in mass communication media, it is presumed that it approved the interpretation given the earlier statute by the florida supreme court.” | 3 |
| 7 | Davies v. Bossert | green | “since no other section of chapter 770 uses the language 'other medium' as found in section 770.01, we can infer reasonably that the legislature intended that term to include television and radio broadcasting stations.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.