Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 2,631 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Quintin Orpiano v. Gene M. Johnson, Warden W. P. Rodgers, Asst. Warden (Security) R. A. Clendenen Correctional Corporal.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quintin Orpiano v. Gene M. Johnson, Warden W. P. Rodgers, Asst. Warden (Security) R. A. Clendenen Correctional Corporal Anchor | green | “makes general and conclusory objections that do not direct the court to a specific error in the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations.” | 2,090 |
| 2 | United States v. Delfino De Leon-Ramirez | green | “appeal a magistrate judge's findings that were not objected to below, as 636(b) doesn't require de novo review absent objection.” | 496 |
| 3 | Larone Elijah v. Richard Dunbar | green | “grounds for objection are clear, district court judges must consider them de novo, or else run afoul of both 636(b)(1) and article iii.” | 45 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.