Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 68 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc. Anchor | green | “arises from the inability of the injured, despite the exercise of due diligence, to know of the injury or its cause.” | 40 |
| 2 | Cochran v. GAF Corp. | green | “where the facts are so clear that reasonable minds cannot differ, the commencement period may be determined as a matter of law.” | 12 |
| 3 | Mest v. Cabot Corp. | green | “the discovery rule is designed to 'ameliorate the sometimes-harsh effects of the statute of limitations,' and it is often applied in medical malpractice and latent disease cases in which the plaintiff is unable to discover his or her injury until several years after the tort occ…” | 8 |
| 4 | Scranton Gas & Water Co. v. Lackawanna Iron & Coal Co. | green | “put another way, the question in any given case is not, what did the plaintiff know of the injury done him? but, what might he have known, by the use of the means of information within his reach, with the vigilance the law requires of him.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.