Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 66 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Interest of Walter W..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Interest of Walter W. Anchor | green | “children cannot, and should not, be suspended in foster care or be made to await uncertain parental maturity.” | 51 |
| 2 | In Re Interest of JNV | green | “a parent may as surely neglect a child of whom she or he does not have possession by failing to put herself or himself in a position to acquire possession as by not properly caring for a child of whom she or he does have possession.” | 8 |
| 3 | In re Interest of Joseph S. | green | “one need not have physical possession of a child to demonstrate the existence of neglect contemplated by 43-292(2).” | 4 |
| 4 | In re Interest of Jahon S. | green | “thus, in a case involving termination of parental rights, it is proper to consider a parent's inability to perform his or her parental obligations because of incarceration” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.