5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 233 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Irene Seacrist v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Irene Seacrist v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare Anchor | green | “we note that it is the responsibility of the and not the courts to reconcile inconsistencies in the medical evidence” | 110 |
| 2 | Lance Stormo v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security | green | “he burden of persuasion . . . to demonstrate rfc remains on the claimant, even when the burden of production shifts to the commissioner at step five” | 26 |
| 3 | Charles R. GROSS, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee | green | “if a symptom can be reasonably controlled by medication or treatment, it is not disabling.” | 11 |
| 4 | Bonnilyn Mascio v. Carolyn Colvin | green | “emand may be appropriate . . . where an alj fails to assess a claimant's capacity to perform relevant functions, despite contradictory evidence in the record, or where other inadequacies in the alj's analysis frustrate meaningful review.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.